Beyond trial neutrality: treatment discontinuation and the hidden signal in SPIRIT-HF trial
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Taken together, the findings from SPIRIT-HF challenge a simplistic interpretation of neutral trial results from an under-powered study, and instead appear to highlight the critical role of treatment durability in determining clinical outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, where patients are older, multi-morbid, and physiologically vulnerable, the balance between efficacy and tolerability is particularly fragile. Importantly, treatment discontinuation should not be viewed merely as an adverse event, but as a clinically meaningful signal reflecting both patient vulnerability and potential loss of therapeutic benefit. These observations suggest that the effectiveness of neurohormonal therapies may depend as much on their sustained use as on their intrinsic pharmacologic efficacy. Accordingly, future therapeutic strategies should prioritize not only the initiation of disease-modifying treatments but also their long-term tolerability, adherence, and continuity.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
