Editorials
31 March 2026

Beyond trial neutrality: treatment discontinuation and the hidden signal in SPIRIT-HF trial

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
19
Views
21
Downloads

Authors

Taken together, the findings from SPIRIT-HF challenge a simplistic interpretation of neutral trial results from an under-powered study, and instead appear to highlight the critical role of treatment durability in determining clinical outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, where patients are older, multi-morbid, and physiologically vulnerable, the balance between efficacy and tolerability is particularly fragile. Importantly, treatment discontinuation should not be viewed merely as an adverse event, but as a clinically meaningful signal reflecting both patient vulnerability and potential loss of therapeutic benefit. These observations suggest that the effectiveness of neurohormonal therapies may depend as much on their sustained use as on their intrinsic pharmacologic efficacy. Accordingly, future therapeutic strategies should prioritize not only the initiation of disease-modifying treatments but also their long-term tolerability, adherence, and continuity.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2023 focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2023;44:362739.
2. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure. Circulation 2022;145:e8951032.
3. Desai N, Olewinska E, Famulska A, et al. Heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction: a review of disease burden and unmet medical needs. Heart Fail Rev 2024;29:63162.
4. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Engl J Med 1999;341:70917.
5. Zannad F, McMurray JJ, Krum H, et al. Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1121.
6. Patel SK, Teoh H, Saunthar A, et al. The emerging role of aldosterone synthase inhibitors in overcoming reninangiotensinaldosterone system therapy limitations: a narrative review. Card Fail Rev 2025;11:e20.
7. Pitt B, Pfeffer MA, Assmann SF, et al. Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2014;370:138392.
8. Nguyen DV, Nguyen HTT. Cardiovascular benefits of spironolactone in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction:
insights from a win ratio analysis of the TOPCAT trial. Card Fail Rev 2025;11:e24.
9. American College of Cardiology. SPIRITHF: does spironolactone benefit patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.acc.org
10. American College of Cardiology. Study finds no significant benefit of spironolactone in HFpEF or HFmrEF [Internet]. Available from: https://www.acc.org
11. ClinicalTrials.gov. Spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure (SPIRITHF) (NCT04727073) [Internet]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov
12. Trevisan M, Fu EL, Xu Y, et al. Stopping mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists after hyperkalaemia: trial emulation in routine care
data. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:1698707.
13. Beldhuis IE, Myhre PL, Claggett B, et al. Efficacy and safety of spironolactone in patients with HFpEF and chronic kidney disease. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:2532.
14. Rossignol P, Dobre D, McMurray JJ, et al. Incidence and prognostic significance of hyperkalemia and worsening renal function in
patients with heart failure receiving eplerenone. Circ Heart Fail 2014;7:518.
15. Damman K, Valente MA, Voors AA, et al. Renal impairment and outcome in patients with heart failure: an updated metaanalysis. Eur Heart J 2014;35:45569.
16. Fonarow GC, Hernandez AF, Udelson JE, et al. What counts for worsening heart failure events. JAMA Cardiol 2025.
17. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2020;383:141324.
18. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2021;385:145161.
19. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Vaduganathan M, et al. Finerenone in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. N
Engl J Med 2024;391:147585.
20. Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Udell JA, et al. Blinded withdrawal of finerenone after longterm treatment in the FINEARTSHF
trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2025;86:3969.
21. Usman MS, Hamid A, Qazi SU, et al. The effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on health status in patients with heart failure: a systematic review
and metaanalysis. Global Cardiology 2024;2:8897.
22. Dawood MH, Khan MS, Rashid AM, et al. Aldosterone synthase inhibitors in cardiorenal diseases: a state of th eart review. Global
Cardiology 2025;3:23647.

How to Cite



1.
Copeland V, Coats AJ. Beyond trial neutrality: treatment discontinuation and the hidden signal in SPIRIT-HF trial. Global Cardiol [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 31 [cited 2026 Apr. 17];4(1). Available from: https://www.globalcardiology.info/site/article/view/100