Acute interventional management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: case series and literature review
Published: March 28 2024
Abstract Views: 3069
PDF: 120
HTML: 19
HTML: 19
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) treatment is currently a matter of debate as scarce data are available for the interventional cardiologists. In the present review, we introduce 4 representative clinical scenarios in which different interventional strategies were carried out. Subsequently, we discuss different tools and useful techniques for the treatment of SCAD, presenting the advantages and drawbacks of the conservative approach versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent or bioresorbable scaffolds implantation, and/or cutting balloon angioplasty.
Altmetrics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
Adlam D, Alfonso F, Maas A, Vrints C; Writing Committee. European Society of Cardiology, acute cardiovascular care association, SCAD study group: a position paper on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3353-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy080
Saw J, Mancini GBJ, Humphries KH. Contemporary review on spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:297-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.034
Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, et al. Spontaneous Coronary artery dissection: current state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018;137:e523-57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000564
Alfonso F. Bastante T, Cuesta J, Rodríguez D, Benedicto A, Rivero F. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: novel insights on diagnosis and management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2015;5:133-40.
Adams H, Paratz E, Somaratne J, et al. Different patients, different outcomes: a case-control study of spontaneous coronary artery dissection versus acute coronary syndrome. J Interv Cardiol 2018;31:41-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12447
Lettieri, C. et al. Management and long-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol 2015;116:66-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.039
Vanzetto G, Berger-Coz E, Barone-Rochette G, et al. Prevalence, therapeutic management and medium-term prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: results from a database of 11,605 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:250-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.10.023
Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, et al. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation 2012;126:579-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718
Quadri G, Cerrato E, Escaned J, et al. Importance of close surveillance of patients with conservatively managed spontaneous coronary artery dissection. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:e87-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.020
Tweet MS, Eleid MF, Best PJ, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:777-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001659
Imai M, Kadota K, Goto T, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and clinical sequelae of angiographic peri-stent contrast staining after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation 2011;123:2382-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.003459
Conrotto F, D'Ascenzo F, Cerrato E, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug eluting stents in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Int J Cardiol 2017;238:105-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.027
Macaya F, Salinas P, Gonzalo N, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, Escaned J. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: contemporary aspects of diagnosis and patient management. Open Heart 2018;5:e000884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000884
Dashwood AM, Saw J, Dhillon P, Murdoch D. Use of a three-stent technique for a case of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Canad J Cardiol 2017;33:830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.02.007
Lempereur M, Fung A, Saw J. Stent mal-apposition with resorption of intramural hematoma with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2015;5:323-9.
Macaya F, Salinas P, Gonzalo N, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, Escaned J. Bioresorbable scaffolds to treat spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:e003133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003133
Macaya F, Salinas P, Gonzalo N, et al. Long-term follow-up of spontaneous coronary artery dissection treated with bioresorbable scaffolds. EuroIntervention 2019;14:1403-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00519
Cockburn J, Yan W, Bhindi R, Hansen P. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds guided by optical coherence tomography. Canad J Cardiol 2014;30:1461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.06.025
Cerrato E, Tomassini F, Rolfo C, Gagnor A, Varbella F. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection treated with biovascular scaffolds guided by intravascular ultrasounds imaging. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2017;32:186-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-016-0391-3
Quadri G, Tomassini F, Cerrato E, Varbella F. First reported case of magnesium-made bioresorbable scaffold to treat spontaneous left anterior descending coronary artery dissection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2017;90:768-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27214
Quadri G, Cerrato E, Rolfo C, Varbella F. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection treated with magnesium-made bioresorbable scaffold: 1-year angiographic and optical coherence tomography follow-up. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019;93:E130-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27971
Sorrentino, S. et al. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:3055-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.011
Stone GW, Granada JF. Very late thrombosis after bioresorbable scaffolds: cause for concern? J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:1915-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.863
Ito T, Shintani Y, Ichihashi T, Fujita H, Ohte N. Non-atherosclerotic spontaneous coronary artery dissection revascularized by intravascular ultrasonography-guided fenestration with cutting balloon angioplasty. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2017;32:241-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-016-0397-x
Mele M, Langialonga T, Maggi A, Villella M, Villella A. Self-expanding stent for spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a rational choice. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2016;17:e254-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000371
Macaya, F Salazar CH, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, et al. Feasibility and safety of intracoronary imaging for diagnosing spontaneous coronary artery dissection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:763-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.023
How to Cite
Acute interventional management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: case series and literature review. (2024). Global Cardiology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/cardio.2024.22
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
