Safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure in cancer versus non-cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
There is an ongoing debate regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for atrial fibrillation in patients with cancer. We searched PubMed and Scopus from the database's inception until November 2024 and included studies comparing cancer patients with non-cancer patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation. Our primary outcome was short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, major bleeding, device complications, and pericardial complications. For the dichotomous outcomes, risk ratios (RR) were used, whereas generic inverse variance (GIV) was used to pool the RRs and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A random effects model was used to evaluate all the outcomes. Our analysis showed a significantly higher rate of short-term mortality in patients with cancer as compared to non-cancer patients (RR=2.07; 95% CI [1.12 to 3.84]; p=0.02). From secondary outcomes, pericardial complications showed a significantly higher risk in cancer patients (RR: 2.17, 95% CI [1.51, 3.12]; p<0.0001). Meanwhile, other secondary outcomes were found to be insignificant. LAAO in cancer patients was significantly associated with higher short-term mortality and pericardial complications.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.