Reviews
31 December 2025

Aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. A focused review

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
271
Views
94
Downloads
8
HTML

Authors

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) has traditionally been managed with watchful waiting because of low annual sudden death rates (<1%) and concerns regarding procedural risk. Emerging randomized data indicate that irreversible myocardial injury may occur before symptom onset and that early aortic valve replacement (AVR) may improve outcomes. This review summarizes evidence from contemporary randomized controlled trials evaluating early surgical AVR (SAVR) or transcatheter AVR (TAVR) vs conservative management or surveillance in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The RECOVERY trial randomized 145 asymptomatic patients with very severe AS (mean age 64 years) to early SAVR or conservative care. Over a median follow-up of 6.2 years, all-cause mortality occurred in 1% of the early surgery group vs 15% with conservative management (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.67; p=0.003). The AVATAR trial included 157 asymptomatic patients with severe AS, preserved LVEF, and negative exercise testing (mean age approximately 67 years). Over a median follow-up of 32 months, the composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 16.6% of patients assigned to early surgery compared with 32.9% in the conservative group (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.90; p=0.02). The EARLY TAVR trial randomized 901 asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF to TAVR or clinical surveillance (mean age 75.8 years). After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, the primary composite outcome of death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization occurred in 26.8% of the TAVR group versus 45.3% of the surveillance group (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.40-0.63; p<0.001). Cardiovascular hospitalizations occurred in 20.9% vs 41.7%, all-cause mortality in 8.4% vs 9.2%, and stroke in 4.2% vs 6.7%, with no excess procedural complications in the early TAVR group. Randomized evidence demonstrates that early AVR, including both SAVR and TAVR, reduces mortality and major cardiovascular events in carefully selected asymptomatic patients with severe AS. The integration of clinical features with risk stratification tools, such as global longitudinal strain, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, natriuretic peptides, and computed tomography-based valve calcification, supports timely intervention before irreversible myocardial damage occurs.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Ng AC, Prihadi EA, Antoni ML, et al. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain is predictive of all-cause mortality independent of aortic stenosis severity and ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:859–67.
2. Agrawal A. Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: early intervention in perspective. Indian J Clin Cardiol 2020;1:154–63.
3. Bække PS, Bajoras V, Butt J, et al. Mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in young multimorbid patients as compared to an age-, gender- and comorbidity-matched background population. Front Cardiovasc Med 2025;12:1600790.
4. Elmariah S. Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2015;17:391.
5. Rosano GM, Farkas J. Evolving targets for heart failure: the journey so far. Global Cardiology 2023;1:6.
6. Rosano GM, Coats AJ. Modulation of cardiac metabolism in heart failure. Global Cardiology 2024;2:30.
7. Kang DH, Park SJ, Lee SA, et al. Early surgery or conservative care for asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2020;382:111-9.
8. Banovic M, Putnik S, Penicka M, et al. Aortic valve replacement versus conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: the AVATAR trial. Circulation 2022;145:648-58.
9. Rahman H, Ghosh P, Nasir F, et al. Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. IJC Heart Vasc 2024;53:101005.
10. Généreux P, Schwartz A, Oldemeyer JB, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2025;392:217-27.
11. Yokoyama Y, Takagi H, Kuno T. Early surgery versus conservative management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;163:1778-85.
12. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at five years. N Engl J Med 2023;389:1949-60.
13. Costa GNF, Cardoso JFL, Oliveiros B, et al. Early surgical intervention versus conservative management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2022;109:314-21.
14. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021;143:E72-227.
15. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2022;43:561-632.
16. Butler J, Shah SJ, Magwire M, et al. Treatment pathways in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity: perspectives from cardiology specialists and patients. Global Cardiology 2024;2:38.
17. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Dulgheru R, et al. Outcomes of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis followed up in heart valve clinics. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3:1060-8.
18. Lancellotti P, Donal E, Magne J, et al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart 2010;96:1364-71.
19. Kapelouzou A, Tsourelis L, Kaklamanis L, et al. Serum and tissue biomarkers in aortic stenosis. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2015;2015:38.
20. Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, et al. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2010;121:151-6.
21. Ng AC, Prihadi EA, Antoni ML, et al. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain is predictive of all-cause mortality independent of aortic stenosis severity and ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:859-67.
22. Nakatsuma K, Taniguchi T, Morimoto T, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2019;105:384-90.
23. Stamos K, Delaporta T, Delaportas A. Bridging the gap: integrating stress echocardiography, iFR, CFR, and FFR in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Global Cardiology 2025;3:66.
24. Redfors B, Pibarot P, Gillam LD, et al. Stress testing in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation 2017;135:1956-76.
25. Tzolos E, Kwiecinski J, Berman D, et al. Latest advances in multimodality imaging of aortic stenosis. J Nucl Med 2022;63:353.
26. Vidal-Pérez R, Jankowska EA. The scientific targets: the myocardium, the vasculature and the body’s response to heart failure. Global Cardiology 2024;2:19.
27. Loganath K, Craig NJ, Everett RJ, et al. Early intervention in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and myocardial fibrosis: the EVOLVED randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2025;333:213-21.

How to Cite



1.
Shafiq A, Trehan RD, Lainscak M, Trehan S. Aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. A focused review. Global Cardiol [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 31 [cited 2026 Apr. 21];3(4). Available from: https://www.globalcardiology.info/site/article/view/93