Articles

SMART-HF: structured management approach to remote treatment of heart failure. Guiding best practices

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 11 September 2026
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Responses to remote pulmonary artery pressure data vary across providers, days, and institutions, and only a minority of patients with elevated pressures reach targets linked to survival under ad hoc management. We evaluated SMART-HF, a structured pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PAD)-guided workflow, in a community heart failure cohort. We retrospectively analyzed 37 adults (mean age 75.1±10.4 years; 17 [45.9%] female; left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% in 23 [62.2%]; atrial fibrillation or flutter in 24 [64.9%]; hypertension in 32 [86.5%]; mean eGFR 54.9±21.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; median NT-proBNP 1846 [IQR 813-4036] pg/mL) with an implanted pulmonary artery pressure sensor managed with SMART-HF. PAD was averaged over prespecified 14-day windows at baseline, 90 days, and 6 months. Two prespecified hemodynamic management performance indices (HMPI) were defined: the 90-Day Target HMPI (PAD ≤20 mmHg at 90 days) and the 6-Month Delta HMPI (PAD reduction >2 mmHg from baseline). Thirty-six patients had paired 90-day and 29 had paired 6-month windows. Mean PAD decreased from 18.3±7.0 to 16.1±6.3 mmHg at 90 days (change −2.1±3.3 mmHg; 95% CI −3.2 to −1.0; P<0.001) and from 18.8 ± 6.8 to 15.5 ± 5.8 mmHg at 6 months (change −3.3±4.3 mmHg; 95% CI −4.9 to −1.7; P<0.001). The 90-Day Target HMPI was met in 26/36 (72.2%; 95% CI 54.8–85.8; P=0.011) and the 6-Month Delta HMPI in 19/29 (65.5%; 95% CI 45.7–82.1). Nineteen patients (51.4%) had baseline PAD >20 mmHg; in this subgroup PAD fell by −2.9±3.6 mmHg at 90 days (n=19; P=0.002) and −4.9±4.9 mmHg at 6 months (n=15; P=0.002), with the 6-Month Delta HMPI met in 12/15 (80.0%; P=0.035) − approximately double the 24% target-attainment rate reported for comparable patients under ad hoc management. No serious adverse events or heart-failure hospitalizations occurred. Seven patients required management for electrolyte derangements and eight met KDIGO criteria for acute kidney injury during decongestion; in five, transmitted pressure waveforms revealed occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and after successful restoration of sinus rhythm, all five continued to decongest safely. SMART-HF was associated with improved ambulatory pulmonary artery pressures in patients with either elevated or controlled baseline averages and a reassuring safety profile supportive of additional large-scale research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2026. CA Cancer J Clin 2026;76:e70043.
2. Bozkurt B, Ahmad T, Alexander K, et al. HF STATS 2024: Heart failure epidemiology and outcomes statistics: an updated 2024 report from the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail 2025;31:66-116.
3. Zile MR, Abraham WT, Stevenson LW, et al. Relationship between remote, ambulatory pulmonary artery pressures, and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2025;18:e012754.
4. Zalawadiya S, Abraham J, Rathman L, et al. Early reduction of pulmonary artery pressures is associated with improved mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2025;13:102589.
5. Atzenhoefer M, Dille E, Steinke R, et al. Bridging the gap between study outcomes and real-world results. Algorithm-driven management in a rural CardioMEMS population. Global Cardiology 2025;3:63.
6. Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:658-66.
7. Costanzo MR, Stevenson LW, Adamson PB, et al. Interventions linked to decreased heart failure hospitalisations during ambulatory pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. JACC Heart Fail 2016;4:333-44.
8. Brugts JJ, Radhoe SP, Clephas PRD, et al. Remote haemodynamic monitoring of pulmonary artery pressures in patients with chronic heart failure (MONITOR-HF): a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2023;401:2113-23.
9. Faris RF, Flather M, Purcell H, et al. Diuretics for heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:CD003838.
10. Grinstead WC, Francis MJ, Marks GF, et al. Discontinuation of chronic diuretic therapy in stable congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease or to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:881-6.
11. Neuberg GW, Miller AB, O’Connor CM, et al. Diuretic resistance predicts mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. Am Heart J 2002;144:31-8.
12. Mentz RJ, Anstrom KJ, Eisenstein EL, et al. Effect of torsemide vs furosemide after discharge on all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with heart failure: the TRANSFORM-HF Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023;329:214-23.

How to Cite



1.
Atzenhoefer M, Atzenhoefer T, Boxwala H, Nelson B, Staudacher M, Iqbal F. SMART-HF: structured management approach to remote treatment of heart failure. Guiding best practices. Global Cardiol [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 11 [cited 2026 Sep. 11];4(3). Available from: https://www.globalcardiology.info/site/article/view/116