Original Articles
30 June 2025

Sex-based differences in characteristics, management, and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) exhibits significant sex-based differences in clinical presentation, management, and outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate these differences using data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF). We analyzed 65,605 patients with HFrEF (EF <40%) from the SwedeHF registry. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were compared between females and males. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of treatment use. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization, adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. Odds ratios (OR) were reported for treatment use, and hazard ratios (HR) were used for outcome analyses. Females (29.0%) were older than males and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (61.3% vs 49.8%) and valvular disease (17.2% vs 11.1%), while males had a higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease (70.5% vs 40.1%) and diabetes (31.6% vs 28.4%). Males were less likely to receive beta-blockers (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81), and more likely to receive sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (OR: 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.38) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy (OR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.30-1.52). During a median follow-up of 2.1 years, males had a higher risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (HR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.22), cardiovascular death (HR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.37), and HF hospitalization (HR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.12-1.19). In this large cohort of patients with HFrEF, males had worse outcomes across all major cardiovascular endpoints. These findings highlight the need for tailored strategies to address sex-based disparities in HF management and improve outcomes for both sexes.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, et al. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res 2023;1183272-87.
2. Shah KS, Xu H, Matsouaka RA, et al. Heart failure with preserved, borderline, and reduced ejection fraction: 5-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2476-86.
3. Pina IL, Kokkinos P, Kao A, et al. Baseline differences in the HF-ACTION trial by sex. Am Heart J 2009;158:S16-23.
4. Ghali JK, Krause-Steinrauf HJ, Adams KF, et al. Gender differences in advanced heart failure: insights from the BEST study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;422128-34.
5. Dewan P, Rorth R, Jhund PS, et al. Differential impact of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:29-40.
6. Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in heart failure. Int J Heart Fail 2020;2:157-81.
7. Walsh MN, Jessup M, Lindenfeld J. Women with heart failure: unheard, untreated, and unstudied. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:41-3.
8. Chatterjee NA, Borgquist R, Chang Y, et al. Increasing sex differences in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Eur Heart J 2017;38:1485-94.
9. Zusterzeel R, Selzman KA, Sanders WE, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women: US Food and Drug Administration meta-analysis of patient-level data. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1340-8.
10. Stolfo D, Uijl A, Vedin O, et al. Sex-based differences in heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum: phenotyping, and prognostic and therapeutic implications. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:505-15.
11. Martinez-Selles M, Doughty RN, Poppe K, et al. Gender and survival in patients with heart failure: interactions with diabetes and aetiology. Results from the MAGGIC individual patient meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:473-9.
12. Piro M, Della Bona R, Abbate A, et al. Sex-related differences in myocardial remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1057-65.
13. Cenko E, Manfrini O, Yoon J, et al. Sex differences in heart failure following acute coronary syndromes. JACC Adv 2023;2:100294.
14. O'Meara E, Clayton T, McEntegart MB, et al. Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. Circulation 2007;115:3111-20.
15. Savarese G, Vasko P, Jonsson Å, et al. The Swedish Heart Failure Registry: a living, ongoing quality assurance and research in heart failure. Ups J Med Sci 2019;124:65-69.
16. Ghali JK, Pina IL, Gottlieb SS, et al. Metoprolol CR/XL in female patients with heart failure: analysis of the experience in Metoprolol Extended-Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Circulation 2002;105:1585-91.
17. Simon T, Mary-Krause M, Funck-Brentano C, Jaillon P. Sex differences in the prognosis of congestive heart failure: results from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II). Circulation 2001;103:375-80.
18. Walli-Attaei M, Joseph P, Johansson I, et al. Characteristics, management, and outcomes in women and men with congestive heart failure in 40 countries at different economic levels: an analysis from the Global Congestive Heart Failure (G-CHF) registry. Lancet Glob Health 2024;12:e396-e405.
19. Tamargo J, Rosano G, Walther T, et al. Gender differences in the effects of cardiovascular drugs. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2017;3:163-82.
20. Cannata A, Mizani MA, Bromage DI, et al. A nationwide, population-based study on specialized care for acute heart failure throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Heart Fail 2024;26:1574-84.
21. Cannata A, Mizani MA, Bromage DI, et al. Heart Failure specialist care and long-term outcomes for patients admitted with acute heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2025;13:402-13.
22. Cannatà A, Fabris E, Merlo M, et al. Sex differences in the long-term prognosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. Can J Cardiol 2020;3637-44.
23. De Bellis A, De Angelis G, Fabris E, et al. Gender-related differences in heart failure: beyond the "one-size-fits-all" paradigm. Heart Fail Rev 2020;25:245-55.
24. Madaudo C, Parlati ALM, Di Lisi D, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology: a peek at the future and the role of ChatGPT in cardiology practice. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2024;25:766-71.

How to Cite



1.
Basile C, Anker SD, Savarese G. Sex-based differences in characteristics, management, and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Global Cardiol [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 30 [cited 2025 Jul. 16];3(2). Available from: https://www.globalcardiology.info/site/article/view/73