Original Articles
16 July 2025

Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF and HFpEF) exhibits significant sex-based differences in clinical presentation, management, and outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate these differences using data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF). We analyzed 64,046 patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF (EF ≥40%) from the SwedeHF registry. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were compared between females and males. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use as odds ratios (OR). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization as hazard ratios (HR), adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. Females (42.5%) were older than males (median age 79 years vs 75 years), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (73.8% vs 70.0%), and were more likely to present with severe symptoms (NYHA class III-IV: 36.8% vs 28.8%). Males had a higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease (52.3% vs 42.9%) and diabetes (27.4% vs 23.8%). Females were significantly less likely to receive SGLT2 inhibitors (OR 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.36), while males were less likely to receive beta-blockers, digoxin, nitrates, and loop diuretics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, males had a higher adjusted risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.13-1.19), as well as higher risks for cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.23-1.32) and HF hospitalization (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.15). Females with HFmrEF and HFpEF in the SwedeHF registry had a distinct clinical profile, were less likely to receive certain GDMTs, yet exhibited a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to males. These findings underscore the importance of targeted strategies to optimize HF care for females.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Shahim B, Kapelios CJ, Savarese G, Lund LH. Global public health burden of heart failure: an updated review. Card Fail Rev 2023;9:e11.
2. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2022;24:4-131.
3. Sotomi Y, Hikoso S, Nakatani D, et al. Sex Differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e018574.
4. Lam CSP, Arnott C, Beale AL, et al. Sex differences in heart failure. Eur Heart J 2019;40:3859-68.
5. Dewan P, Rorth R, Jhund PS, et al. Differential impact of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:29-40.
6. Piro M, Della Bona R, Abbate A, et al. Sex-related differences in myocardial remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1057-65.
7. Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in heart failure. Int J Heart Fail 2020;2:157-81.
8. Walsh MN, Jessup M, Lindenfeld J. Women with heart failure: unheard, untreated, and unstudied. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:41-3.
9. Chatterjee NA, Borgquist R, Chang Y, et al. Increasing sex differences in the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Eur Heart J 2017;38:1485-94.
10. Zusterzeel R, Selzman KA, Sanders WE, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women: US Food and Drug Administration meta-analysis of patient-level data. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1340-8.
11. Stolfo D, Uijl A, Vedin O, et al. Sex-Based differences in heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum: phenotyping, and prognostic and therapeutic implications. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:505-15.
12. Pina IL, Kokkinos P, Kao A, et al. Baseline differences in the HF-ACTION trial by sex. Am Heart J 2009;158:S16-23.
13. Walli-Attaei M, Joseph P, Johansson I, et al. Characteristics, management, and outcomes in women and men with congestive heart failure in 40 countries at different economic levels: an analysis from the Global Congestive Heart Failure (G-CHF) registry. Lancet Glob Health 2024;12:e396-e405.
14. Cannata A, Mizani MA, Bromage DI, et al. A nationwide, population-based study on specialized care for acute heart failure throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Heart Fail 2024;26:1574-84.
15. Cannata A, Mizani MA, Bromage DI, et al. Heart failure specialist care and long-term outcomes for patients admitted with acute heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2025;13:402-13.
16. Tamargo J, Rosano G, Walther T, et al. Gender differences in the effects of cardiovascular drugs. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2017;3:163-82.
17. O'Meara E, Clayton T, McEntegart MB, et al. Sex differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure: results of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. Circulation 2007;115:3111-20.
18. Martinez-Selles M, Doughty RN, Poppe K, et al. Gender and survival in patients with heart failure: interactions with diabetes and aetiology. Results from the MAGGIC individual patient meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:473-9.
19. Ghali JK, Krause-Steinrauf HJ, Adams KF, et al. Gender differences in advanced heart failure: insights from the BEST study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:2128-34.
20. Ghali JK, Pina IL, Gottlieb SS, et al. Metoprolol CR/XL in female patients with heart failure: analysis of the experience in Metoprolol Extended-Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Circulation 2002;105:1585-91.
21. Madaudo C, Parlati ALM, Di Lisi D, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology: a peek at the future and the role of ChatGPT in cardiology practice. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2024;25:766-71.

How to Cite



1.
Basile C, Anker SD, Savarese G. Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Global Cardiol [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 16 [cited 2025 Jul. 16];3(2). Available from: https://www.globalcardiology.info/site/article/view/76